13th October 2009 (03:30)
Current Mood: nervous

Watching Stan's match earlier almost gave me an aneurysm. Man.
That second set tie break, I was convinced he was a goner.
And the last game of the third before the TB.
But that last tie break was a thing of beauty, especially when Stan did that second ace and the commie was all like "Yeah, Wawrinka means business!". It was the same commentator who did one of his matches against Delpo earlier this year (I think Rome, but maybe Madrid), I think he quite likes Stan. Or maybe he just likes the miraculous comebacks, he does talk a lot about determination. Thank God it worked out in Stan's favour this time (although I do remember being quite impressed at the time that Stan managed to hold Delpo off until the end, even though he spent half of that match playing like he'd never seen a racquet before).
I should have been doing Maths homework this evening.
Instead, I've spent the last 6 hours reading/watching interviews with a certain Mr Wawrinka to calm me down from earlier whilst listening to Boyzone songs (...oh Stephen ;_; (because I was asked to translate on Facebook, Stephen Gately dying is basically like Nick Carter dying, if that helps any of you Americans who aren't familiar with the mid-to-late-nineties-Irish-boyband-scene understand the gravity of the situation)).
See, I always feel quite sorry for Stan, that in basically every interview he has the interviewer always asks about Federer, and sometimes Stan seems a bit like "yeah, Rogi's great, but if you just want to know about him then interview him, not me" although he's always far too polite to say that outright. But, then I noticed that even if the interviewer doesn't say anything at all about Roger, Stan still mentions him anyway. Sometimes completely superfluously and awkwardly. Which makes me rethink my attitude to the quote from last week. Maybe the interview did actually go "So do you mind playing indoors instead of out?" "I don't care, indoors or out, it's all the same to me. And I don't care that Roger isn't here either. I mean, is he not here? I actually hadn't even noticed, because I so don't care about him not being here. It's not like he promised to take me out to dinner in Japan or anything." rather than there being a second question in there like I assumed.
I also think it's very, very sweet that after his loss to Stan in Monte Carlo, Roger doesn't get all "he only won because I played badly". I mean, you can see sort of he wants to. If it had been Murray he'd lost to, he would have had a field day with it. Or I guess basically any other player. But with Stan he's basically falling over himself to keep saying that it's Stan's win not his loss. If that's not love, I don't know what is.
(Is it wrong for me to lol every time Stan says "very happy"?)
Anyway, more pics from today's fuckery:
( Cut time. )
Not looking forward to the match against Roddick.